<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Since it seems to be quiet here on the Aquanet list, I
thought I’d pass along something that has become a heated discussion on
the Wet Canvas website. Apparently, the gold medal winner at the 2008 American
Watercolor Society show has been accused of copyright infringement. The
painting in question is a combination of two photographs taken by a
photographer who claims not to have given the winning artist permission to
reproduce the images. In addition, there seems to be some question as to
whether the winning painting is really a painting at all or, perhaps, a high
quality print. The “print or painting” discussion has arisen among
photographers who point to a flaw in the photo being visible in the winning painting.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Here’s the link to the ongoing discussion at Wet
Canvas (be advised it’s already 14 pages long and still growing) . . .<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><a
href="http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=515288">http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=515288</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>If the gold medal winner is ultimately proven to be a fraud,
it would seem to put the AWS in a very awkward position, especially if the “painting”
turns out not to be a painting at all. As someone who’s never entered a
show, I’m fascinated by this story and somewhat surprised that a
prestigious group such as the AWS doesn’t do more stringent “vetting”
of submissions to its annual show.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Jack <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>